Solar feed-in tariff guidance lift for New South Wales

New South Wales’ Independent Pricing and Segulatory Tribunal (IPart) has published its solar feed-in-tariff tariff rate for the 2025/26 financial year.

NSW Electricity retailers do not have to offer the state’s solar owners. Every year, iPart benchmark areas, which for system owners are paid for the payment of the excess solar power they have on the net.

For the current financial year, the guidelines for feed-in tariffs in NSW are 4.9 to 6.3 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh).

For 2025/26, the instructions are 4.8 ° C to 7.3 C/kWh. According to the IPart, the increase in the upper end of the benchmark area reflects that wholesale prices will be a little more in times of the 2025-26 financial year in contemporary solar power systems.

IPart has also released daily solar feed-in-tariff benchmark areas for 2025/26. Very few retailers offer this option, but you can see the iPart instructions for these prices here.

The tariff tariffs of the feed are always much lower than the electricity price of electricity, since retailers have to repeat a number of costs, such as: B.:

  • Network fees for using the network.
  • Payments for environmental programs.
  • Operating costs such as billing services and ongoing call centers.

And of course a profit margin.

When solar power systems export to the network during the day, the electricity costs of the electricity are often much lower. Exert pressure on the feed -in tariffs down. The negative electricity prices in New South Wales are becoming increasingly common due to an increase in the production of renewable energies.

But if the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow, electricity prices in wholesale shoot, and this is (part) the reason why electricity prices for retail are stubbornly high, while the feed tariffs remain comparatively low. In the case of NSW, the cost increases associated with the roadmap of the state and higher transmission costs also contributed to upcoming electricity price increases.

Instead of obtaining an income with feed-in tariffs, the actual value when installing a solar power system is to maximize the self-consumption of solar energy today in order to avoid that high network rest rates with high main changes-and it has been the case for several years.

Increase self -use with a sun battery

One way to increase the self -consumption of solar energy is to save excess in a house battery for use in the evening, overnight and under conditions for poor solar power generation.

While higher feed tariffs increase the repayment of the home battery, NSW solar owners * * from * two * generous incentives for a legitimate battery (the current NSW battery discount and the upcoming discount of the federal government) should be able to benefit. And even to join a VPP, if you want this, a small feed -in tariff (should it happen) will have little effect.

Only the “stackability” of the NSW and the Battery Battery discounts; The last time that the government of New South Wales was still working on it, and other gremlins in the top requirement reduction scheme (PDRS) in connection with the storage of household energy. In just 4 weeks until the federal discount falls, we hope that all of this will be able.

The best electricity plans for NSW solar owners

As already mentioned, electricity retailers in New South Wales must not be necessary to offer tariffs within IPart’s guidelines or something – but most do it. Using the solar quotes electricity plan comparison tool and entering the postal form 2000 (Sydney), this shows, while a considerable number of plans offer less than the lower benchmark 2024/25 from iPart. A retailer offers 12 C/kWh, but has high consumption rates, and other devils can contain in detail.

This is part of the trick for solar owners when choosing the best electricity plan. Ideally, it should be a balance between reasonable feed, usage tariffs and daily charges without difficult conditions. And solar owners are usually better with simple, solid consumption tariffs. While solar and battery owners should take a look at tariffs with lower submissions and shoulder prices.

Comments are closed.