Solar Analytics Integrated Review: Better Than Sungrow Monitoring?
If you have decided to invest in a hardware consumption monitor to measure your solar energy flows, there are three prominent options on the market:
- Buy the inverter manufacturer’s consumption monitor and use the inverter manufacturer’s monitoring software (subscription-free for most inverters).
- Buy the inverter manufacturer’s consumption monitor and connect its data to the ‘Solar Analytics Integrated’ solution ($6 per month or $60 per year).
- Buy dedicated ‘Solar Analytics’ hardware (made by WattWatchers) which communicates via 4G to the ‘Solar Analytics Classic’ solution ($6 per month or $60 per year).
If you have rooftop solar, but don’t want to pay for a hardware monitor, and are happy with seeing day-old data, you can use your retail smart meter as a pseudo-consumption monitor using ‘Solar Analytics Integrated+’, which Finn explains in depth here.
Many other third-party monitoring options are available, but this is a review for people considering whether they should pay extra for Solar Analytics or use their inverter’s consumption monitoring.
In this review, I’ll compare your options using the free Sungrow monitoring software as the challenger.
I’ll explain:
- The difference between Solar Analytics ‘Classic’ and ‘Integrated’ monitoring systems, and the pros and cons of each.
- Compare Solar Analytics with Sungrow inverter monitoring.
- Show a real-life case study, including removing hardware, connecting devices, and comparing functionality between monitoring solutions.
Solar Analytics Classic Vs Integrated
Solar Analytics Classic
The ‘Classic’ option uses additional hardware, in the form of a device that is installed in the customer’s switchboard. Sensors (AKA CT clamps) are connected to the device and clamped around the measured circuits.
Solar and consumption data is transmitted via 4G (goodbye 3G) every few seconds, analysed by Solar Analytics software, and provided in (almost) real-time to the user.
The ‘Classic’ solution is flexible, and designed to be compatible with any inverter or AC load.
Solar Analytics Integrated
The ‘Integrated’ subscription allows direct access to solar data via the inverter, eliminating the need for the add-on hardware mentioned above. It relies on WiFi or ethernet connectivity to send data in 5-minute intervals.
This option offers several advantages, and of course, some disadvantages. An additional consumption monitor is needed if you want to measure consumption data. This is not mandatory but strongly recommended. Some inverter and battery manufacturers provide a consumption monitor in the form of a smart meter, so it may not be necessary to buy one.
The other downside of the “Integrated” model is that it’s only available to an exclusive club of compatible inverters – Fronius, Sungrow, Goodwe, LG, and GE. Solar Analytics assures us that this list is growing.
The Pros And Cons of Solar Analytics Subscription Models
‘Classic’ Pros
✅ Comprehensive Real-time Monitoring: Allows you to closely monitor both solar generation and electricity consumption in real-time.
✅ Versatility: It is compatible with various inverter types and AC loads.
✅ Sub-Circuit Monitoring: Includes the additional feature of monitoring specific sub-circuits such as hot water or heating systems.
‘Classic’ Cons
❌ Additional Costs: In addition to the monthly subscription fee, a smart monitoring device will need to be purchased and installed by a licensed electrician.
❌ No Battery Monitoring: This can be a drawback if your solar setup includes battery storage.
‘Integrated’ Pros
✅ Direct Inverter Data Access: Accesses solar inverter data via APIs, eliminating the need for an additional monitoring device. This simplifies the setup process.
✅ Reduced Costs: No smart monitoring device is required for measuring solar data. (A device may still be needed for measuring consumption data).
✅ Battery System Monitoring: Unlike the Classic subscription, the Integrated subscription can monitor battery systems.
✅ Advanced Features: It offers additional features such as dynamic control for hybrid inverters and batteries, and ‘Relevant Agent’ authority.
‘Integrated’ Cons
❌ Limited Inverter Compatibility: Only compatible with specific solar inverter brands, such as Fronius, Sungrow, Goodwe, and GE.
❌ Consumption Meter Required: To fully utilize the Integrated subscription, a consumption meter must be installed.
Connectivity Options for Solar Analytics
‘Classic’ utilizes the 4G mobile network to transmit data. ‘Integrated’ relies on a WiFi or ethernet connection. Either could be a blessing or a curse, depending on your particular location. Typically, a hard-wired ethernet connection is the preferred option for any device to avoid dodgy WiFi drop-outs or issues with a lack of 4G network coverage.
Proprietary Inverter Monitoring
Most popular inverter brands available in Australia come with their own proprietary inverter monitoring platform, so why not just use that?
Good idea. Why spend more cash on bells and whistles for a rooftop solar system you bought to save yourself money in the long run?
And therein lies the answer – ‘saving yourself money in the long run’.
First, let’s look at why anyone would be interested in monitoring at all: Solar and consumption monitoring enables real-time tracking of energy production, understanding energy usage patterns, and identification of optimisation opportunities, ultimately leading to cheaper electricity bills.
These things can save you money. The problem is that not everyone is an energy geek, glued to their respective devices and apps, trying to determine the best time to export to the grid or turn on the hot water system.
That’s where Solar Analytics steps in. It has features that keep an eye on the big picture, so you don’t have to. It can alert you when there’s a problem, find the best electricity plan based on your usage patterns, and recommend battery size based on your accumulated energy data.
This is starting to sound like an advertisement for Solar Analytics, but I can assure you it’s not. Many proprietary inverter monitoring apps do a great job and may be all you need. Due to the number of inverters available, it’s not within this article’s scope to list each one’s pros and cons.
I can, however, show you a case study in which a solar/battery owner ditched his old Solar Analytics 3G smart monitoring device, and now uses the ‘Integrated’ subscription in conjunction with the proprietary inverter monitoring app, to get the best out of both worlds. And that solar/battery owner happens to be Finn Peacock, the founder of SolarQuotes.
Case Study – Solar Analytics ‘Integrated’ Vs Sungrow iSolarCloud
Finn had a battery installed to his existing rooftop solar system on a property in March this year. This provided a good opportunity to remove his soon-to-be redundant Solar Analytics 3G monitoring device and move from the Solar Analytics ‘Classic’ subscription to the ‘Integrated’ subscription.
He’s had about three months to monitor the system, collect some data, and compare with the proprietary app (Sungrow iSolarCloud) that came with the battery/inverter. Let’s take a look.
System Specs
- Solar Panels: 6.6kW Winaico panels (12 x 300W panels facing west, 10 x 300W panels facing east).
- Inverter: Sungrow SH5.0RS hybrid inverter.
- Battery: Sungrow SBR128 (12.8kWh of storage).
- Monitoring 1: Sungrow iSolarCloud.
- Monitoring 2: Solar Analytics ‘Integrated’ subscription.
Removing The 3G Monitoring Device
The original monitoring device installed in the switchboard was a Solar Analytics SC-23 3G Solar Smart Monitor. This rebranded Wattwatchers device is no longer available because of the imminent 3G shutdown.
This device was removed due to the 3G phase-out, but also because Finn changed to the Solar Analytics ‘Integrated’ subscription, which measures the solar data via the inverter.
The removal of the Solar Analytics device conveniently left room in the switchboard to install a Sungrow S100 Energy Meter, which would be used to measure consumption data. This device was ‘free’ as part of the battery installation.
The Sungrow Energy Meter comes with a CT (current transformer) that clamps around the incoming supply, plus an RS485 cable connected from the energy meter to the inverter. The removal and/or installation of these devices is to be done by a licensed electrician, so yes, this is an additional expense.
Miser’s Tip: It’s not necessary to remove or disconnect the redundant Solar Analytics 3G device if you don’t want to go to that expense. It will quite happily sit there transmitting data out to the world for the rest of its life, even if no one is listening. However, removing it would make sense if another meter was being installed, as was the case here.
Integration Of Solar Analytics With Sungrow iSolarCloud
Finn tells me that integration was simple.
“I gave the inverter serial number to the Solar Analytics guy. Then I went into iSolarCloud, and to Plant Configuration > Plant > Scroll down > Settings > Add channel Partner > Type in [email protected] Done.”
After integration, Finn’s rooftop solar and battery could be monitored using either/both the Solar Analytics dashboard and/or the iSolarCloud app. Each has its own benefits.
Overview of the iSolarCloud Portal
After logging into iSolarCloud, and assuming you’ve already registered and entered all your details into the configuration settings, you’ll come you the ‘Overview’ page. This is where all the action happens for the user. Note that the following info is regarding the desktop app, and may appear slightly different on the mobile app.
The ‘Overview’ page is clear and well set out, starting with a nice animated power flow diagram in real-time showing energy flows of PV production/self-consumption, grid purchased energy/feed-in, and battery charge/discharge.
Beside and below that show numerical values for ‘Self-consumption of PV’, ‘Today Revenue’, ‘Today Yield’, ‘Real-time Power’, ‘Current Month’s Yield’, ‘Revenue This Month’, ‘Total Yield’, and ‘Total Revenue’.
Scroll down a bit further to find historical data by clicking on buttons for ‘Day’, ‘Month’, ‘Year’, and ‘Total’. You can select any day/month/year you like. The data is output nicely on two pie/circle charts, and a linear chart for easy viewing.
The two pie charts show energy inputs/outputs (PV/ battery/ grid) on the left chart and consumption on the right, broken down into ‘Self-sufficiency’ and ‘Purchased Energy’ with percentages for all.
The linear chart has PV/ Grid/ Battery/ Load data appearing in five-minute intervals, is easily zoomable, and is large enough for visually challenged people like me. The vertical and horizontal movable crosshairs on this chart are particularly good for reading precise values rather than having a bit of a guess.
Additional Features of the iSolarCloud Portal
Without going into full-blown detail, the toolbar on the left of the page lets you access more features. From top to bottom, they are:
- Home – This brings you to a page where you can manage multiple ‘Plants’ (PV systems).
- Fault – Allows you to set up alarms for a wide range of fault conditions.
- Report – Generate statistical reports daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, or customise your own.
- Curve – Detailed histograms are here such as total DC power, phase currents and voltages, MPPT currents and voltages, and grid frequency. These are useful for diagnosing faults and analysing performance.
- Advanced – This tab contains a sub-menu here with ‘Settings’ and ‘Live Data’ amongst others. These are diagnostic tools for the installer/technician. The ‘Live Data’ button gives similar diagnostic information to ‘Curve’, only in real-time.
For comparison, let’s have a quick look at the Solar Analytic portal.
Solar Analytics ‘Integrated’ Portal Dashboard
Logging into the Solar Analytics portal brings you to the ‘Dashboard’. This starts with a linear chart showing energy produced and consumed today with data logged in 5-minute intervals. The chart is clear enough, but the iSolarCloud one is larger and gets the win for the visually challenged.
The other thing disappointing about the Solar Analytics portal is the absence of live data, particularly the real-time animated power flow diagram. There’s something satisfying about watching those little arrows pushing electricity into your house from the solar panels, and filling up the battery.
Back to Solar Analytics. Under the linear chart are large clickable buttons ‘System Performance’, ‘My Energy Usage’, ‘My Electricity Bill’, ‘Solar Savings’, and ‘Plan Optimiser’. These buttons show basic information such as relevant numerical totals etc. Clicking on each of the buttons takes you to a more detailed page with charts, histograms, and breakdowns. The toolbar on the left of the page navigates similarly.
Best Features of Solar Analytics
The standout features of Solar Analytics are, without doubt, the ‘System Performance’ reports, and electricity ‘Plan Optimiser’.
- System Performance
Measures the actual energy production from your solar power system compared with the expected energy production based on a combination of historical data, location, and weather. It notifies you when something isn’t quite right, and recommends an action. - Plan Optimiser
Looks at your solar and consumption data, to compare available market electricity plans with your current plan. These show projected (not actual) savings based on previous data. The more data you have, the more accurate projections may be.
One More Option for Solar Analytics Connectivity
Finn could have upgraded his 3G smart meter with the current 4G version and kept using the Solar Analytics ‘Classic’ subscription. This would have given him real-time monitoring, plus the ability to monitor sub-circuits within his installation, but no battery monitoring, or advanced features such as dynamic control and ‘Relevant Agent’ authority.
No problem – the Sungrow iCloud app would handle the battery monitoring, plus a more intuitive real-time display for all power flows. Also, upgrading to a Solar Analytics 4G device comes with the added expense of buying and installing another device.
Would I Upgrade to Solar Analytics or Stick with Sungrow’s Monitoring?
Monitoring apps for both solar and consumption are so useful, I’d go as far as saying they’re a must-have for any rooftop solar system. This is particularly so as the system gets more complex, with additional factors to consider such as batteries, EV chargers, TOU tariffs, DNSP shut-down requirements, etc. As usual, there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution. Each monitoring platform has its benefits and shortcomings.
I’d Choose Sungrow
From my perspective, if I had to choose only one of the options listed above for a solar + battery system, it would be the Sungrow iSolarCloud. The display, plus the depth of diagnostic tools is the deal-maker for me.
Non-Energy-Nerds Should Get Solar Analytics
For the average Joe/Jolene, who isn’t an energy nerd, and is time-poor, I’d say Solar Analytics Integrated is the way to go. The ‘System Performance’ and ‘Plan Optimiser’ features take the hard work out of it. We all want an easy life. The $6 per month will put many people off, but just the savings from the retail plan optimisation tool should more than cover that cost.
After I’d written this article, I asked Finn some questions to see if we were on the same page. Almost!
What do you miss most about the old Solar Analytics monitoring now that the 3G device is gone?
“I miss the extra channels for measuring individual appliance usage – for example seeing how much hot water the kids are using with their bloody 30-minute showers at midnight!”
If you had to pick only one out of – old Solar Analytics vs Solar Analytics integrated vs Sungrow iSolarCloud, which would you choose for (a) yourself, and (b) a solar newbie?
“Solar Analytics integrated. I’m a firm believer that you should always have monitoring with your solar. If you buy the inverter’s monitoring (integrated) instead of Solar Analytics (now Wattwatchers) hardware – you are much more likely to be able to integrate it with a future battery or solar smart EV charger. For example, if you have a Fronius inverter, it needs the Fronius smart meter to talk to the Fronius EV charger, or to control a battery (with the new Gen 24 inverters). And I think the $60 per year is worth it to get an early warning if there’s a problem with your system. Speaking of which I really need to go and figure out why my system is only performing at 75%…”
Comments are closed.